360 Wiki Writers Opiniões 28

TrustScore: 3 em 5

3,2

Embora não verifiquemos reivindicações específicas uma vez que os autores têm direito a ter a sua opinião, podemos classificar as opiniões como "Verificadas" quando conseguimos confirmar a ocorrência de uma interação com a empresa. Saber mais

Para proteger a integridade da plataforma, todas as opiniões na nossa plataforma (verificadas ou não) são analisadas pelo nosso software automatizado 24 horas por dia, 7 dias por semana. Esta tecnologia foi concebida para identificar e remover conteúdos que violam as nossas diretrizes, incluindo opiniões que não se baseiam numa experiência real. É possível que não consigamos dar conta de tudo, pelo que poderá sinalizar alguma coisa que ache que nos possa ter escapado. Saber mais

Leia as opiniões dos outros

Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

pague para que crearan mi pagína de wikipedia. parecian tener todo claro, incluso en la pagina de pago explicaban los pasos. dos meses despues no responden mis correos, dinero tirado a la basura

Classificada 5 em 5 estrelas

Derek was a great help with my Wikipedia page. He’s professional reliable and really knows the ropes. Made the whole process super easy even with Wikipedia's strict rules. Would definitely recommend.

Classificada 5 em 5 estrelas

360 Wiki Writers is the best place to build a Wikipedia page. I got my wiki page created for myself, and they did an amazing job. From the start, their was professional, knowledgeable, and highly atte... Ver mais

A empresa respondeu

Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

I am a doctor, a husband, and the father of two children. I thought I was mature and educated enough not to be manipulated in life—deceived to such an extent that it cost my children and me our live... Ver mais

Informações sobre a empresa

Escrito pela empresa

We are a team of qualified professionals that help eligible individuals and companies to create their Wikipedia page.


Informações de contacto

3,2

Aceitável

TrustScore: 3 em 5

28 opiniões

5 estrelas
4 estrelas
3 estrelas
2 estrelas
1 estrela

Não respondeu a opiniões negativas

Como esta empresa usa o Trustpilot

Veja como as respetivas opiniões e classificações são obtidas, classificadas e moderadas.

Na Trustpilot, as empresas não podem oferecer incentivos ou pagar para esconder opiniões. As opiniões pertencem a cada um dos utilizadores e não à Trustpilot. Saber mais

Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

un engaño absoluto

pague para que crearan mi pagína de wikipedia.
parecian tener todo claro, incluso en la pagina de pago explicaban los pasos.
dos meses despues no responden mis correos,
dinero tirado a la basura

9 de abril de 2026
Opinião espontânea
Classificada 5 em 5 estrelas

Derek was a great help with my…

Derek was a great help with my Wikipedia page. He’s professional reliable and really knows the ropes. Made the whole process super easy even with Wikipedia's strict rules. Would definitely recommend.

11 de fevereiro de 2026
Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

DO NOT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE I MADE.

I am a doctor, a husband, and the father of two children. I thought I was mature and educated enough not to be manipulated in life—deceived to such an extent that it cost my children and me our livelihood. I will never forgive myself for trusting sweet-talking liars.

Dear friends, acquaintances, and strangers, I make my most sincere appeal to you: DO NOT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE I MADE. Do not fall for people from this so-called company. I will not mention their names, not even by initials, in order to protect their legally guaranteed right to privacy. But please, if you have questions about how they manipulate people and would like to hear my story, write a comment in reply.

1 de dezembro de 2025
Opinião espontânea
Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

This is a scam organization

This is a scam organization — please, do not engage with them.

Like others have already described, they first “review” your sources and confirm that everything is fine, only to change their story after you’ve made payment and been passed on to their so-called editor. Then they suddenly claim your sources are “not credible” and “won’t be accepted by Wikipedia.”

Their next move? They try to upsell you — offering to “create new content” or “find better sources” for more money. If you refuse and ask for a refund, they start threatening you with legal action and even claim they’ll report you to Wikipedia for hiring them.

Absolute crooks. I usually trust my gut and spot this kind of thing, but not this time. The biggest red flag, in hindsight, was that they immediately agreed to the low fee I proposed at the start — real professionals never do that.

13 de novembro de 2025
Opinião espontânea
Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Almost got scammed

Almost got scammed - caught it at the last moment.

Spoke to Derek Andrews via chat on their website. He jumped in after 5 mins of browsing which I thought was great because I like to do things quickly.

FIRST RED FLAG: Noticed some content on their website was still in Latin - like placeholder from a design that was not replaced. Didn't think much of it - it's an easy mistake to make.

After a good hour conversation, I asked him to send me the info and pricing we discussed in an email.

SECOND RED FLAG: Email did not get through - not even to junk. He jiggled something and then finally got one through to junk.

Didn't think much of it, email has problems all the time. Got the email, read through it and it looked good. I replied with a smaller project and amount to start.

THIRD RED FLAG: He called me 'Assad' in the email - my last name. Typical Indian thing - for some reason, Indian people always call me by my last name.

I still didn't clue in. I'm VERY distracted today and just trying to get some stuff done.

FOURTH AND CLINCHING RED FLAG: He sent the invoice to start the project - not for a deposit, but for the full amount. The URL used for payment was pcamp.io - never heard of it. Checked with Grok and Co-pilot, and sure enough, it's flagged.

I was so close to losing $2,000. I'm usually very astute when it comes to scams, but man they are getting sophisticated. The only way I even found these guys was from a Copilot (chatGPT) search.

Be careful out there folks.

10 de novembro de 2025
Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Happy to take your money and you get nothing!

Amount of contact before paying them: texts while at work, phone calls all the time including at work, spam emails asking when am I going to pay.

Amount of contact after paying them: absolutely none-have to fight to get them to reply and takes serious delays.

I first gave them ALL the information I had and told them what they wanted. They said fine. After paying them a ton of money (at least for me) I heard nothing from them for months despite reaching out. The only thing I received from them was spam email asking me to sign up with them? Super fun. After about three months finally responded. They then charged me more for images-like a lot more and stupidly I paid for it. After many more months they reached out and said, your project is going to fail, Wikipedia has stringent guidelines and you don't meet them and by the way do you have X Y, or Z? No. No I do not have those things, as I said before paying I gave you everything I had. So. I dumped a couple of years worth of advertising budget to get nothing. I have not heard back for over a month and am now resigned for getting nothing for a ton of hard earned money! You can pay a fraction of this and have someone honest on UpWork tell you before you pay not to do it (I checked).

19 de maio de 2025
Opinião espontânea
Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

NOW JOINED FORCES WITH COMPLETE SCAMMERS AND CROOKS - BEWARE!

AS A RESULT OF BEING SCAMMED BY GLOBALWIKIEXPERTS, WHO ARE NOW PART OF 360 WIKI WRITERS, IT'S IMPORTANT TO READ THIS REVIEW FOR 360 ABOUT THEIR JOINING FORCES WITH THE CROOKS WHO STOLE MY MONEY AS THEY NOW COULD VERY WELL STEAL YOURS:

GLOBAL WIKI EXPERTS REVIEW:

$749 poorer, 7 months later, with zero results and a whole lotta excuses before everyone in the sting operation went AWOL.

These scammers are clearly not experts at anything but taking your money and running away with it.

Naming and shaming the criminals: ADAM HUDSON, the guy who was handed the mission of getting a Wiki presence up and running IN FEBRUARY, who subsequently disappeared for the last 3 months only to reappear a few days ago after my negative review - only to disappear yet again after more lame almost-excuses, with no attempt at making things right; MATTHEW, the "Team Manager" without a last name or telephone number (I should have seen that one coming!) who, rather than taking control of the situation (that is, actually managing it) clearly ditched the whole mission once my money was in their bank account; and WILLY TURNER who invoiced me for services never-rendered, who with the other two should be behind bars.

Not a single person with basic knowledge and whose actual job it is to get a wiki page up and running (for a fee!) would have found getting my page up on Wikipedia even remotely challenging. After all it's not like I'm an unknown entity in my field - but it's clear they had no desire to get a page up in the first place, being the crooks that they are.

Apparently they have joined forces with 360 Wiki Writers - so a caution to anyone also considering using 360 Wiki. Whether they know it or not, 360 Wiki Writers are now operating with the creeps of GlobalWiki in their ranks, so are either unaware of the criminality of their new partners or encouraging it, and can't be trusted.

Global Wiki Experts have not only cost me my hard earned money, but time I will never get back and potential investors I was hoping would tap into my Wiki page to see the breadth and scope of what I do. I'm left absolutely disgusted by this whole wasted journey and am about to instigate legal action.

21 de agosto de 2025
Opinião espontânea
Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Warning

Warning. This company mislead me every step of the way, from beginning to end. When I initially spoke to a representative,I was told that I needed to pay a required $500.00 before they could give me any details. After paying the amount requested I was asked to send them any references that I had. I sent what documents I had and was told that they were not sufficient. I then said to the representative that if my documents were not sufficient, and you weren't able to get me a wikipedia page, then I wish you had explained that to me before I paid for your services. I was immediately told that they could still get the page. Long story short, I was shuffled to three different representatives before finally being told to check back in four months because it takes that amount of time for the page to get approved. This was in June of 2024. I checked back in December of that same year only to be told that the previous representatives were no longer handling my page. I was given a forth representative who explained to me that I needed to purchase eight references and that these references would guarantee me a wiki page. They further stated that it would not take another four months, even stating that it should be done before Christmas. I paid an additional $1,100.00 for articles that were supposed to guarantee to me the page. Another few months went by and I received an email congratulating me on my wikipedia page. I used the link in the email only to find that the page had been removed to a draft stage, and not available. After informing the rep about the status of the page, I was told the fact that my page was made live, and
their obligation to me was completed. I then contacted a supervisor/ owner of said company, who informed me that technically and legally the rep was right. even though the page did not stay live more than a few hours. His exact words to me is that I was misled, and that the representative who misled me had also misled seven other clients,
further stated that, that particular rep was fired. He went on to say that if I purchased two additional references for $1,500.00 he could get the page back live again. I explained to him that, if I
had known about this process and their requirements in the beginning, I never would have spent one dime on their service. I refused to pay more and was told that I could not get a refund on the $1,600.00 that I had already paid. I then said that if 360 wikiwriters would pay for the additional references and the page stayed live, I would then reimburse them the $1,500.00. Of course they refused
afterall, why would they trust me. Basically, this company admitted to me that I was misled by their own representatives, but refused to be responsible for their deceptive actions and make me whole again. I have text messages and documents to back-up my review. They also record the calls so they too can further validate my review. They use the word misled, but to me, who has spent $1,600.00 for references that I neither want nor need, in my opinion this was a scam. I will not stop with just writing this review. I hope others will be warned about the malpractices of this company.

5 de abril de 2025
Opinião espontânea
Classificada 5 em 5 estrelas

I mostly worried about creating a…

I mostly worried about creating a Wikipedia page that would not be flagged or deleted. 360 Wiki Writers took care everything proper research and scrupulous adherence to Wikipedia's seemingly ironclad rules. My page was approved smoothly and is live. If you want your wiki page to be written and approved professionally, then they know exactly what to do!

24 de março de 2025
Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Beware of 360WikiWriters – A TOTAL SCAM!

I had a terrible experience with 360WikiWriters. They initially convinced me to purchase a package of PRs, claiming it was necessary to establish notability for my Wikipedia page. After I paid, they suddenly told me I needed even more PRs to support the content—something they never mentioned upfront.
To pressure me into paying more, they sent a screenshot of my page being declined by Wikipedia, making it seem like an external issue. But in reality, they were the ones taking it down themselves to manipulate me into spending more money! It’s a complete scam and extortion tactic.
Stay away from 360WikiWriters unless you want to be deceived, overcharged, and left with nothing in return.

1 de março de 2025
Opinião espontânea
Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

SCAM, be aware

I wish I could give zero stars. My experience with 360WikiWriters was nothing short of disappointing. They advertise themselves as professional Wikipedia writers, but in reality, they take your money and provide subpar, plagiarized content that gets rejected instantly. This is a real scam.

At first, we trusted their process and even followed their recommendation to purchase press releases (PRs) to support the Wikipedia page. However, when their poorly written submission was rejected, instead of fixing their work, they insisted we needed even more PRs—turning it into an endless cycle of additional payments with no tangible results.

And before they attempt to dismiss this review as fake (which seems to be a common tactic of theirs), we have ample evidence—emails, payment records, and chat logs—that clearly expose their deceptive practices. If you’re thinking about using their services, do yourself a favor and look elsewhere for a reputable company.

8 de setembro de 2024
Opinião espontânea
Classificada 5 em 5 estrelas

The 360 Wiki Writers did a fantastic…

The 360 Wiki Writers did a fantastic job at creating a very professional and research-based Wikipedia page for my brand. Their team was well-aware of the results and policies Wikipedia has, thus providing content hat was neutral, verifiable, and met all standards of notability. They made sure to really research and build accurate citations using credible sources wile presenting that data in a very structured nd interesting manner. The team was responsive to my queries and kept me updated on all the steps that they were taking.

23 de outubro de 2024
Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Much the same as jia Tony’s review

Much the same as jia Tony’s review. They couldn’t do enough when they wanted my custom. When the page THEY created didn’t get accepted Chris who dealt with me didn’t want to know. I basically paid for a page that I could easily have produced myself. Total scam

19 de outubro de 2024
Opinião espontânea
logótipo da 360 Wiki Writers

Resposta da 360 Wiki Writers

Hello Boogie,

We are truly sorry to hear about your experience, and we want to clarify a few things to help address the issue you’ve raised.

To resolve this situation as quickly as possible, we kindly request that you provide your project details and supporting documents, such as the invoice and chat history, directly to our support team. This will help us investigate further.

Please contact us at [sales@360wikiwriters.com or 866-514-7152] so we can work together to clarify any misunderstandings and find a solution.

We appreciate your patience and look forward to resolving this.

Best Regards,
Team 360 Wiki Writers.

A Experiência Trustpilot

Qualquer pessoa pode escrever uma opinião na Trustpilot. As pessoas que escrevem opiniões têm direito a editá-las ou eliminá-las a qualquer momento. Estas opiniões serão exibidas enquanto uma conta estiver activa.

As empresas podem solicitar opiniões enviando convites automáticos. Classificadas como "Verificada", pois se tratam de experiências genuínas.

Saiba mais sobre outros tipos de opiniões.

Contamos com uma equipa especializada e tecnologia inteligente para proteger a nossa plataforma. Descubra como combatemos opiniões falsas.

Leia mais sobre como processamos as opiniões na Trustpilot.

Aqui estão 8 dicas para escrever óptimas avaliações.

A verificação pode ajudar a garantir que são pessoas reais a escrever as opiniões que lê no Trustpilot.

Oferecer incentivos em troca de opiniões ou solicitá-las selectivamente pode distorcer o TrustScore, o que vai contra as nossas directrizes.

Saiba mais