Quantpad Opiniões 9

A super overpriced version of CC/Codex with a bit of market data

ideation feature is useless just a worse version of codex. when you write a long prompt to the ai it crashes the site and you need to force quit. usage limits are very small and makes it unusable I use the monthly usage in 3-4 days. very laggy and writes a lot of errors and bugs when it writes code. price is bad for what it offers take your 60$ and use it on Quantconnect.com way better and it actually doesnt crash and you can see your backtest results without running out of monthly usage in 3 days. the "code" feature is just a re-vamped codex/claude code that is told to code pine script. ideation is unusable unless you create small undefined strategy. in short quant pad is practically unusable as of now and for the price your better of going to another quant site if I could get a refund I would.

Quantpad really reduced the barrier to entry for me and has been pretty easy to get the hang of. Honestly, could have used this years ago.

coding doesnt really work all that well. it only works for the most basic strategies

Proper tutorial videos were promised and never delivered. Reached out to support for a refund until that was released and I was removed from their discord with no further communication.

From my experience the past couple weeks, I’ve been extremely impressed with QuantPad. You get well over a decade of 1-minute market data, keep in mind data that would normally cost thousands, plus built-in AI tools, all for a fraction of the price in comparison. The Ideation page really stuck out to me, it lets you build and test ideas directly on that data, which noticeably sped up my research. Also, the AI on the Code page is a clear standout. It’s easily better at Pine Script than ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, and its auto-fix feature has consistently caught and corrected errors instantly, no copying into TradingView just to debug. That alone has saved me hours. If you build trading strategies, QuantPad is an easy first choice. The only thing I will say is that the Python notebooks have RAM limits that make some really heavy machine learning work off-limits, but they recently put out that they’re actively investing in more compute as the platform grows, so that will likely be a nonissue in the near future.

Has the potential to be an incredibly useful platform but as of now it seems limited and underwhelming. Chatgpt can handle everything QuantPad can (from concept development to strategy coding,) with the exception of backtesting and a strategy library (both of which can be done independantly). Decent product, but I would wait for more features to rollout before paying 60$ a month, stick to ChatGPT for now.

So many cool tools and cheap for how much it can do. Was definitely not underwhelmed. This is the new reality of quant trading and it’s fascinating

Not enough admin support / involvement. For a startup $60 is steep for what it had to offer at launch. What you would like to see either a 1. A free beta, or 2. Lower the cost. At least just be active in the discord. If thomas truly believed in his software you would want to see him actually using it - not leaving it up to us to figure out while collecting his $60 for what seems to be delayed support. Not to mention you can get the same working strategies with any other ai like chatgpt or claude ai at a fraction of the costs. I am sure Quantpad will become a good resource eventually but the whole issue was the mess of the beta. Didnt think it through - Money grab.