For nearly two decades of operations, this is the first time White Lotto has had to deal with this type of pressure campaign.
We encourage everyone to visit our website, review our live projects, check the quality of our work, and make their own judgment based on facts.
Now, to respond to the review directly:
Milen Nikolov has never interacted with the White Lotto project in any business, technical, operational, or contractual capacity.
Based on the timing, wording, and context of the review, we have reason to believe that this may be connected to Alex Dragomirov, Martin Ivanov and Georgi Kosturkov.
All three made a very good first impression on a personal level. However, from a business perspective, it appears that they are attempting to place responsibility for their own commercial failure on White Lotto.
They received a White Label platform from White Lotto, and the platform was fully operational within weeks.
After approximately seven months of being live, they delivered no meaningful results in terms of customer acquisition. Instead of taking responsibility for their own marketing performance, they started blaming others for the lack of results.
It is also important to add that White Lotto did not charge them any monthly minimums during that period. On the contrary, White Lotto continued covering their monthly maintenance costs in good faith, based on the understanding that these costs would eventually be repaid.
They never repaid those costs.
Despite this, after approximately seven months of operating the platform, they began demanding a refund. White Lotto refused because the service had been delivered, the platform had been operational, and White Lotto had already absorbed ongoing costs on their behalf.
After that refusal, negative content started appearing online. In our opinion, this appears to be an attempt to pressure White Lotto into granting an unjustified refund.
The key questions are simple:
Why was no refund requested during the seven months when the platform was live and operational?
How many real customers did they actually bring to the platform?
What specific marketing actions did they personally execute during that period?
What evidence do they have of an actual platform failure?
Why should White Lotto be held responsible for their failure to acquire users?
And finally, why are public accusations being posted now instead of presenting verifiable business results, traffic data, customer numbers, or evidence of a technical or operational failure?