Quite funny reading the responses to…
Quite funny reading the responses to negative reviews from the company owner (maybe I can have one too!). Came across the website from Googling a product and was somewhat put off by the general tone so thought I'd do a little research before ordering. Nothing wrong with riding the wave of right-wing populism as a marketing strategy I suppose (I'm a retired businessman and very pro business and entrepreneurs), and the supplement industry is rife with smoke and mirrors claims - so nothing unusual there. However, a big red flag is the overdue accounts and statutory returns for all the companies the owner controls. Also note that the supplement company loaned the owner (via another company under his control) £1.4m to buy a property. Buyer beware - pay with a credit card if you intend to purchase. Also an interesting analysis on the Skeptic website.
EDIT:
Just had an email from Trustpilot saying that British Supplements have "asked for more details to better understand your experience". I think my review is very clear: I would have purchased from the company but didn't because I was put off by the website and the owner's responses to negative reviews. In addition, the company has failed to make its statutory filings with Companies House, which is a red flag regarding having any commercial dealings with them. Perhaps I should respond in a similar way the owner might: "Can't you read?"
FURTHER EDIT: Been asked to review my review as potentially defamatory. My review only includes information that is freely available in the public domain via Companies House. The “red flag”I highlight is my personal opinion. It maybe the case that the company will treat customers fairly in its commercial dealings. That is up to each individual to decide. I decided not to purchase from the company on the basis of freely available and factual information. There is nothing defamatory in stating facts that are easily verified.
Resposta da British Supplements