MetroPM Opiniões 

163
TrustScore: 4 em 5

3,8

Embora não verifiquemos reivindicações específicas uma vez que os autores têm direito a ter a sua opinião, podemos classificar as opiniões como "Verificadas" quando conseguimos confirmar a ocorrência de uma interação com a empresa. Saber mais

Para proteger a integridade da plataforma, todas as opiniões na nossa plataforma (verificadas ou não) são analisadas pelo nosso software automatizado 24 horas por dia, 7 dias por semana. Esta tecnologia foi concebida para identificar e remover conteúdos que violam as nossas diretrizes, incluindo opiniões que não se baseiam numa experiência real. É possível que não consigamos dar conta de tudo, pelo que poderá sinalizar alguma coisa que ache que nos possa ter escapado. Saber mais

Leia as opiniões dos outros

Classificada 5 em 5 estrelas

George has been very helpful in dealing with an issue caused by a leak in my neighbour's property. He is polite, pleasant and professional to deal with - unlike many others in a similar role.

Classificada 4 em 5 estrelas

My 4 stars woukd be 5 if just for Melanie Jane. It took speaking to Melanie Jane to get an issue resolved. Once in her hands it happened as it should have via other staff members initially, profession... Ver mais

Classificada 5 em 5 estrelas

The residents car park bays needed to be re-painted and re-numbered as they were getting difficult to see. George Liddar from Metro-PM Took on board our request and arranged for the work to be car... Ver mais

Classificada 5 em 5 estrelas

I have been in regular contact with Metro to resolve a few site issues, they have been brilliant, especially Melanie Jane - what an absolute gem she is to that company. Metro is by far the best Manage... Ver mais

Informações sobre a empresa

  1. Imobiliária
  2. Empresa gestora de propriedades
  3. Agentes imobiliários

Informação fornecida por diversas fontes externas

Charted Surveyors and Property Managers


Informações de contacto

3,8

Bom

TrustScore: 4 em 5

163 opiniões

5 estrelas
4 estrelas
3 estrelas
2 estrelas
1 estrela

Sem histórico recente de solicitação de opiniões

Esta empresa não convidou os clientes recentemente, pelo que as opiniões podem não ser representativas

Não respondeu a opiniões negativas

Como esta empresa usa o Trustpilot

Veja como as respetivas opiniões e classificações são obtidas, classificadas e moderadas.

3,8

Todas as opiniões

(163)

31 opiniões nos últimos 12 meses

Escreva uma opinião
Na Trustpilot, as empresas não podem oferecer incentivos ou pagar para esconder opiniões. As opiniões pertencem a cada um dos utilizadores e não à Trustpilot. Saber mais

Classificada 2 em 5 estrelas

Beauchamp House - Just very average or worse

Just very average or worse. Requests for building maintenance ignored or not processed properly. In particular the build up of rubbish around communal areas that no residents take ownership of. I've been left feeling like the building they are supposed to be managing is mostly neglected.

26 de março de 2022
Opinião espontânea
Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

DO NOT USE THIS COMPANY

DO NOT USE THIS COMPANY.

Let me start this review by saying I am a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales (ICAEW) and in my near 30 year professional career, I have never come across someone as dishonest as Matthew Arnold (MA), the owner and Managing Director of this company, MetroPM. These are my reasons.

I was a volunteer Director of the freehold company that owns the apartment block in Edgbaston Birmingham where I live. I noticed the amount we had paid for the gardeners on our site, for the previous 2 year period, was approximately double our contracted rate. MA told us it was for legitimate extras. I doubted this could be the case so requested copies of the actual invoices. It took nearly 3 months and repeated requests before MA finally forwarded these to me.

It was clear, to both me and one of my fellow Directors (one with considerable business experience) and others we showed them too, that almost every invoice for the previous two years had been “padded” with extras that either had not been carried out or were already included in our contract. Every invoice was approved for payment by MA. We concluded it was serious enough to report it to the authorities as suspected fraud. On challenging MA he said that other than forgetting to reduce the standard contracted rate from one year to the next, there was nothing else wrong with the invoices.

However, I later uncovered evidence, in an email from MA to the gardeners, sent many months BEFORE my inspection of these invoices, that he was already talking to them about “the charges levied without agreement” & “these specific charges which are perpetual, unapproved and probably not correct” & “I can't believe for example that so much time and cost was incurred in cutting hedges on a monthly basis when this formed part of the standard contract in the first place”. It seems clear that MA knew far more than he was letting on.

He later contacted the gardeners saying “it seems to me that works have been invoiced from month to month in identical form, regardless of whether that scheduled work has actually been carried out” & “These outstanding issues are placing my company at risk”. MA has NEVER admitted any of this to our leaseholders, this was discovered by chance in an email between him and the gardeners. Our development has not received ONE PENNY back into our bank account to reimburse us for these overcharges.

I have also uncovered evidence that this was happening on a number of developments, all managed by MA and using the same gardeners.

The dishonesty does not stop there. MA was also employed as Company Secretary of our development, and in that role he sent out documents to our leaseholders full of lies about me, resulting in an EGM which removed me as a Director and so stopped me investigating any further. These lies were so damaging I had neighbours heckling me, snubbing me and closing their door in my face. My only recourse was to bring a defamation lawsuit against MA. This was a success and forced him to pay me substantial damages for his lies.

Also, during the EGM process, I and one of my fellow Directors asked for a copy of our Register of Members so we could contact leaseholders ourselves. Contrary to UK Company Law, MA refused to hand it over. MA eventually sent a copy to us where he had changed the contact details to make it impossible for us as Directors to even contact our own shareholders.

To doctor the Register of Members of a Company is a CRIMINAL offence. To cover up a fraud is a CRIMINAL offence.

We are still waiting for Action Fraud to investigate so I would urge any leaseholders who have experienced similar issues on other developments to come forward and report their suspicions to Action Fraud and RICS.

I'll finish where I started – DO NOT USE THIS COMPANY

17 de fevereiro de 2022
Opinião espontânea

A Experiência Trustpilot

Qualquer pessoa pode escrever uma opinião na Trustpilot. As pessoas que escrevem opiniões têm direito a editá-las ou eliminá-las a qualquer momento. Estas opiniões serão exibidas enquanto uma conta estiver activa.

Contamos com uma equipa especializada e tecnologia inteligente para proteger a nossa plataforma. Descubra como combatemos opiniões falsas.

Leia mais sobre como processamos as opiniões na Trustpilot.

Aqui estão 8 dicas para escrever óptimas avaliações.

A verificação pode ajudar a garantir que são pessoas reais a escrever as opiniões que lê no Trustpilot.

Oferecer incentivos em troca de opiniões ou solicitá-las selectivamente pode distorcer o TrustScore, o que vai contra as nossas directrizes.

Saiba mais