I wanted to support independent journalism and so subscribed for a good year. I’ve since decided to cancel and, apparently, need to contact them via phone to do so. They provide only a UK number... Ver mais
Embora não verifiquemos reivindicações específicas uma vez que os autores têm direito a ter a sua opinião, podemos classificar as opiniões como "Verificadas" quando conseguimos confirmar a ocorrência de uma interação com a empresa. Saber mais
Para proteger a integridade da plataforma, todas as opiniões na nossa plataforma (verificadas ou não) são analisadas pelo nosso software automatizado 24 horas por dia, 7 dias por semana. Esta tecnologia foi concebida para identificar e remover conteúdos que violam as nossas diretrizes, incluindo opiniões que não se baseiam numa experiência real. É possível que não consigamos dar conta de tudo, pelo que poderá sinalizar alguma coisa que ache que nos possa ter escapado. Saber mais
Leia as opiniões dos outros
Appalling, disingenuous customer service. I complained about the recent changes to subscriptions and increase in costs several times, including via a customer feedback form. Totally ignored each time.... Ver mais
Over a recent two week period the Guardian posted an advert written enturely in Hebrew, with no English translation. When I tried to protest against this I was censored by the twelve-year olds who... Ver mais
The Guardian Editions app is a retro disaster. The retro paper newspaper format is impossible to read without touching the article headline. Then a readable online format appears, only to find that it... Ver mais
Sem histórico de convites para avaliação
Esta empresa não convidou os clientes, pelo que as opiniões podem não ser representativas
Como esta empresa usa o Trustpilot
Veja como as respetivas opiniões e classificações são obtidas, classificadas e moderadas.
The Guardian consistently lies and if…
The Guardian consistently lies and if not outright lies then incompetence in their field of endeavour ie.lies
The Guardian is my go-to news source…
The Guardian is my go-to news source along with The New York Times. The writing is factual, at times fearless and with humour when required. They must be doing something right if the number of US RWNJ and Bolsonaro trolls are anything to go by. My dealings with the subscription department have been pleasant and they have always been helpful. Don't believe the haters.
putting posts on my feed then trying to…
putting posts on my feed then trying to make me pay them to read them. Sling your hook!
Biased reporting
I’m very disappointed with The Guardian’s seemingly biased reporting of the current war in Ukraine. I found that all its opinionists have only and always considered the NATO’s position without ever taking into account the Russia’s understandable concerns about geopolitical security. Objective and unbiased reporting should be a mandatory requirement in any free, democratic and liberal Country. I contacted them multiple times, by using different methods, to express my views but not ONCE I’ve been acknowledged. And yet their editorial team states that they welcome “strong
viewpoints, particularly from the marginalised communities”…!! I’m going to unsubscribe from their newsletter and share my experience with my friends and followers.
The Guardian is pure propaganda
The Guardian used to be an excellent source of non bias proper journalism .Now it's just total propaganda part of a larger anti semitic lying hate machine of the extreme radical leftist agenda .It has been dismaying and sinister watching it decline and I will no longer read or support it. The Scott Trust Ltd needs to be thoroughly investigated .It would be wholly unsurprising to discover that Mr Soros or Qatar or both are behind it, that is the only explanation for the obscene amount of lies masquerading as journalism they proclaim they uphold ' values of honesty, integrity, courage, fairness, and a sense of duty to the reader and the community' that is sadly so blatantly untrue it defies belief . Make no mistake ,this is the marxist version of dailymail armed with moral authority and a better vocabulary .It's now nothing but a cheap rage baiting hate rag .
The Guardian is just awful.
The Guardian has become what can best be described as the left wing version of the Daily mail. Awful, biased journalism with opinion pieces from the likes of "Grifter in chief" Owen Jones.
I've given up trying to comment on The…
I've given up trying to comment on The Guardian articles. Doesn't matter how polite or factual you are, if your comment goes in the slightest against The Guardian's narrative, it gets deleted. I've even added a comment asking why they're deleting my views, and that got deleted. The Guardian used to be "impartial", but now it will shut anyone down who dares to have an open mind.
Biased and inaccurate
Biased and inaccurate. Just like everyone else.
Pay £12 a month for supposedly full…
Pay £12 a month for supposedly full access, on phone, and pc, rubbish, cant login without a password, which I am not allowed to save, as for mobile, cant log in there either,on mobile am constantly sent notifications to contribute more, and being told have full access, when not only am I unable to log in am being sent articles by Catherine Viner and others, so if you can send me articles to my phone, how come I cannot log in, obviously your accounts dept dosen`t communicate, with your marketing dept, I have cancelled
Long time observer/guardian reader,bout to be…
Long time observer reader,about to be an ex reader,
the final straw is the recent down grade of sports coverage..football league tables stopped listing home and away stats separately.. no longer list team line ups, goal times or attendance .. and the match reports are now ridiculously poor.. for eg spurs v man utd full page article, baring showing the score not ONE paragraph on the game it self. Just a bunch of Googable facts, which questions wether the reporter was actually at the game or wether the article written by ai.
The paper is obviously reacting to budgettry issues Yet it puts in a ridiculous insultingly childish double COLOUR page of find and seek... This used to be a quality publication.. now it's .. well not v good. EDIT .. that's me done with the observer..WHY ? The football coverage used to be excellent, even handed and covering most matches.. today .. sports coverage covered the world cup a double page pull out?and 3 or 4 pages on it months before it was needed, a page of women's football..a double page spread on Aston villa, when a good article covering the match was sufficient,NOT a mention of the other prem fixtures which attracted world wide attention then 5 pages of outdated news on the ashes. And the rest inconsequential.. GOOD BYE GUARDIAN)observer
Predictably poor and quite childish.
It is difficult to find anything positive on the output of this publication. Obvious left wing bias, but the main criticism would be the quality of that leaning, many times lacking sensible journalism and basic common sense approach, more often borderline immature. I have no issue reading approaches to coverage on all sides, but sadly it appears to be primarily written for children.
Love the Guardian
The thing I love about the Guardian is that they are not biased and the proof of that is within their criticism of the current Labour party.
They will criticise any politician, policy or party that they disagree with.
They do their own research, their own investigations and if I'm honest, I think they're much higher quality than BBC Verify for example.
If we could replace the BBC with the Guardian as the main media source in Britain, then I would be very happy indeed.
Activism not Journalism
I have tried to read The Guardian so many times though you allways are left of feeling like you are reading a partison article rather than news with objectivity and counter points. When you look on the Website (ALL SIDES) you see that the centre is getting more news outlets moving to just reporting the facts without bias while the guardian goes more left it makes for unpalatable reading unless you feel comfortable in ech chamber ideas. Hopefully they can be alittle more readble for the average person as they have been around for a long time
Absolute scum.
Absolute scum.
Disgusting, slimy pieces of work should be ashamed of themselves. This is not news, this is propaganda. Unbelievably biased, you must be blind to read this garbage, and brain dead to believe it.
What a load of lying biased drivel
What a load of lying biased drivel
Phony
The lean left and do not support factual evidence. They just trash anyone who has an opposing view and try to come across as intelligent. ARROGANCE.
Absolutely disgusting!
Absolutely disgusting!! In the aftermath of Charlie kirks assassination they've been so biased and gross!! I can't believe a supposedly unbiased publication would report on this as they have....your bias is showing!! It's not a good look!
the Guardian Bolsonaro article
There is an article on the Guardian about Bolsonaro. Also what they call a Riot and a tentative of dictatorship. I'm Brazilian and our actual government is trying to implement dictatorship with the fake judge A. Morais, trying to ban freedom of speech, social media communities, communications, and to support the corruption in Brazil who has inside governance. Therefore what a fake media this "The Guardian", article has been written by a member of Brasilia (capital). Certainly a good friend of the leftist government. But do not worry, similar to Venezuela, USA and Europe will help us free our country from the left corrupted government and bring back fairness, honour and respect to our population. The title of the article should be "the fake judge and the fake Guardian"
Very annoying pop up on every visit
I hate the Guardian politically, but that's not even why I'm leaving this review. I was watching Frasier and they mentioned Marathon bars. I thought I'd look them up and there was a Guardian News article about them, and it was mentioning the temporary rebranding of Snickers to its old name, Marathon, and I still got this annoying pop up. Also, I don't like that they keep track of how many articles I've read by looking at my IP address visits. It's not via cookies because I have all those trackers blocked. I don't have an account, looking at how many times my IP address has visited an article is the only way.
A very average paper
The begging for cash section at the end of every article is annoying and smacks of desperation. The articles that you want to comment on quite often don't have that option and the ones that do are closely monitored so that no snowflakes are offended by any harsh words. A lot of the Lifestyle/Culture articles are pure dross and the 'news' reporting is average at best. Not the worst paper out there (Hello Daily Mail) but nowhere near the best.
A Experiência Trustpilot
Qualquer pessoa pode escrever uma opinião na Trustpilot. As pessoas que escrevem opiniões têm direito a editá-las ou eliminá-las a qualquer momento. Estas opiniões serão exibidas enquanto uma conta estiver activa.
As empresas podem solicitar opiniões enviando convites automáticos. Classificadas como "Verificada", pois se tratam de experiências genuínas.
Saiba mais sobre outros tipos de opiniões.
Contamos com uma equipa especializada e tecnologia inteligente para proteger a nossa plataforma. Descubra como combatemos opiniões falsas.
Leia mais sobre como processamos as opiniões na Trustpilot.
Aqui estão 8 dicas para escrever óptimas avaliações.
A verificação pode ajudar a garantir que são pessoas reais a escrever as opiniões que lê no Trustpilot.
Oferecer incentivos em troca de opiniões ou solicitá-las selectivamente pode distorcer o TrustScore, o que vai contra as nossas directrizes.








