the Guardian Opiniões 

To read, the Guardian is fine, not perfect but one of the few non-Tory papers. But twice on online readers comments my posts have been removed for petty, nonsense reasons by moderator. They allow posts that are sometimes irrelevant to the main article being commented on, sometimes racist or homophobic posts get published. My latest post wasn't in any way offensive or provocative, just criticising the awful current government and the people who vote Tory. Utterly unreasonable on the part of the jobsworth who decides what comments to publish. I have now ended my subscription to The Guardian on principle. Moderator has pathetic delicate sensibilities and must be Tory leaning, or worse, has some hidden agenda, yet seems to allow more extreme comments than mine. Double standards or what. Appalling and illogical censorship of genuine opinions.

Active censorship of comments against their own guidelines.

I have read and subscribed to the guardian for many years. I recently had to stop as what was once a fact based well balanced publication has become an opinion publication.

I’m a leftie but I’m afraid that the Graun is losing me as a reader because it has turned into a gaslighting, finger-wagging, misandrist propaganda rag full of tiresome homilies masquerading as think pieces. I’m also absolutely sick to the back teeth of reading the same lazy and formulaic smearing of mainstream views eg: gender critical/biological reality opinions or lockdown scepticism as “far right” or “misinformation”, often by very young and unworldly posh “just got back from my gap yah” garls, all of
whom have exactly the same off-the-shelf package of political beliefs.

And, apart from being married to the editor, why on Earth does Adrian Chiles get free rein to engage in his deeply dull, whimsical, stream of consciousness musings by way of an opinion column?

I’ve also noticed that increasingly few articles have a BTL comment section and those that do are rigorously policed by inscrutable and intolerant apparatchik interns in the Guardian’s Ministry of Truth, who delete any views they disagree with.

Tbh, the only bits of the once great Guardian that are still worth reading are Marina Hyde, John Harris and John Grace’s columns.

I used to love reading the Guardian. Fair and balanced. Now it’s just a hub for mad feminists, anti-men, gay club that almost makes you feel an outsider if you’re straight.

They also are champions of cancel culture. You make a mild criticism in a comment and your comment gets censored. How is this healthy? Starting to feel sympathy for the anti-woke brigade.

The Guardian is its own worst enemy. Today I deleted my account and swear I won’t read again.

The paper is left leaning and pro people - one of the last sources which still leans in this direction. The rest seem to be peddling the same monotone and rhetoric one sided view of the world. It’s a paper for the 97percent… not the 3 percent.

Been reading since the 90s. Gone really down hill in past few years. Too many lazy editorials light on fact and heavy on opinion. Lots of pointless feeds that just are a brain dump of things occurring with zero analysis. Sort this mess out. All the articles are GIGA neg and does the Board really support allowing Adrian Chiles to have a column waffling about his life married to the Editor. What a disgrace! Yes print media has changed, but there are still loads of left of centre people who want to be informed and heaven knows there are a lot of dodgy things happening right now to report on. In present form the graun is just a dozen student grant types masturbating and of no use to anyone.

The most self-righteous moaning newspaper of all! The reporters in this newspaper purport to know everything, yet I bet none have ever run a business or worked in the private sector where they have to justify their salary with results and profits!

These journalists are needlessly sarcastic, hopelessly unbalanced, overly woke, and totally unrealistic about the world we live in. They expect our politicians to uphold the highest level of moral values and yet successfully deal with regimes like Russia and Iran, not to mention the biased, secretive, undemocratic, wasteful and aggressive EU! You can't have it both ways! If Churchill was around today their criticism would be more damning and louder than anything they have written about Boris or Sunak!

They criticise without proposing solutions that are credible! If you are so clever, what is your solution to the migrant crisis facing the USA, UK and EU? The majority of these people are economic migrants (I don’t blames them) but they have no right to live in our country just because they want to improve their lives. To pretend that all of these millions are under threat of their lives in their own countries is utter nonsense. So shut up or put up solutions!

The Guardian is a highly biased, very antisemitic and pro-Hamas publication located in Greater London, UK.

Trust score: 1/5

Every story is negative, like its journalists hate life and people

Every time there is an Israel - Palestine/Hammas conflict story its always Israel that's in the wrong. They rely for most of their reports on Hammas journalists - if 10 Israelis are killed and 5 Palestinians it will always lead on the Palestinian/Hammas deaths. Very one sided and not independent at all.
Very unreliable source and is full of WOKE stories.
The sooner it goes the better.

With their dedicated journalists this newspaper really deserves the "news provider of the year" award!
Every day I read articles on topics that I do not find in German newspapers. At the moment, it's especially the critical articles on the Israel-Palestine war, as in Germany any criticism of Israel's policies is immediately labeled anti-Semitic and shouted down.

Pathetic
You don’t even care enough to research before reviewing
Absolutely pathetic

they lied about Trumps travel ban! IT IS NOT A Muslim band!!!!

They advertise them self as independent climate pro journalism, but they did not write even a single article about the iceberg on 26th of November or the oil leak on 22nd of November.

they are trying to misinform us about what hapens in Palestine and bias our understanding for this issue

They write about heat pumps in 2023 as if it is something new and they include climate muppetry in the article. Idiot paper.

I am reading The Guardian online everday since two years. But during the last days I realize more and more that some of the journlists of the Guardian don´t see the difference between being Pro-Palestinian and being Pro-Hamas. Tonight I read an article in which they try to explain that the occupation by Israelis cuased the Hamas massacre. I can´t believe it! They really suggest that the fanatic sick islamists of the Hamas beheaded women, old people and even babies, and that they raped women and cut their breasts etc. because of the occupation of the Westbank? Shame on myself that I was reading nearly two years a super left antisemitic newspaper like The Guardian.
For God´s sake I didn´t support them with one Euro so far.
Every reader who is against terrorism should write an mail to the companies that advertise int he Guardian and ask them why they publish advertising in a newspaper that doesn´t condemn clearly the Hamas massacre.
No to terrorism. No to Hamas. No to antisemitism.

A genuine journalist or reputable newspaper engages in thorough investigation, interviews, and scrutiny of the world to construct a well-articulated and balanced story. This approach ensures that informed readers can independently shape their opinions and decisions.

In contrast, The Guardian selectively presents data, omits crucial information, and espouses biased opinions on national or global issues. This departure from journalistic standards has led to The Guardian no longer serving as a reliable source of information but rather as a platform for ideologues who manipulate the paper to disseminate content aligning with their narrative.